| 04 |
| Jun |
A Response to the Ratings of 2012 Security Software by Consumer Reports
Article by Fearless Web TeamFiled under: Hackers and Phishing,Miscellaneous,Smart Protection Network | RSS 2.0 | 5 Comments |
By Tony Larks, Vice President, Global Consumer Marketing, Trend Micro
There’s no doubt that buying the right threat protection system can be a mind boggling task for the modern consumer. That’s why a consumer guide can be a very helpful aid, especially in an area such as information security, where the choice is bewildering and it can be difficult to differentiate.
Problems arise, however, when consumers don’t have the whole story, making it difficult for them to accurately assess competing products. When the firms that compile the ratings don’t open their testing methodologies up to external scrutiny, they undermine their own work and risk misleading the very customers they purport to serve.
Consumers deserve to be given the full picture
A recent review of 2012 Security Software by the well-respected US title Consumer Reports placed Trend Micro™ Titanium™ 11th out of 14 vendors and that is misleading. The 8th placed vendor (Norton) for example was given 70 points versus Titanium’s 60, but had exactly the same category marks with one exception: Titanium actually scored higher under performance. How could this be?
In a similar way, Titanium ranked higher in three categories against 9th placed F-Secure, whereas F-Secure only had one category where it scored higher than Titanium. Some categories are obviously being given more weight than others, but which ones and why? Consumers deserve to be given the full picture.
Titanium is one of the fastest products
In fact, the only difference between Trend Micro Titanium and the 4th placed vendor (ESET) is that Titanium was marked down on “updating” and “performance.” When it comes to updating, we are confident that Titanium is one of the fastest products around because it uses Trend Micro Smart Protection Network™ cloud-security architecture to block new threats immediately, before they have a chance to get onto a customer’s network.
You can’t get much faster than “immediate,” and NSS Labs agrees, rating Trend Micro fastest in 2009 and 2010 tests and this trend continues.
When it comes to performance, Titanium was actually redesigned to improve performance by recommending the use of the Microsoft Windows built-in firewall. It looks like Consumer Reports did not test the MS Firewall for this category, hence handicapping Titanium. It appears that way, but without greater transparency into testing methods we don’t know.
The threat landscape is moving at such a pace that vendors like Trend Micro are constantly being forced to up their game. We have recently moved file reputation to the cloud to improve performance and threat detection rates. This is what Trend Micro means when we say Titanium won’t slow you or your computer down. We have incorporated proactive network-layer botnet detection—so customers’ computers won’t be used to spew spam. And we’ve boosted browser exploit prevention capabilities to keep them from clicking on websites that host malware.
In the end, the most important thing is to protect our customers’ digital lives by providing them with the fastest, most effective way of blocking threats while keeping their valuable digital assets out of harm’s way. We think we’re doing that pretty well. However, it’s not just the vendors who have to keep pace with the rapid pace of technological change, testing methodologies must evolve too.
Consumer Reports needs more openness and transparency about how they reach conclusions
Clearly, the consumer guides with a strong brand and captive audience like Consumer Reports need to take their responsibilities seriously in order to provide the most accurate information possible. This may involve working more closely with the vendor community. It will definitely require more openness and transparency about how they come to their conclusions. Only then will these tests have the legitimacy they deserve.
Tony Larks works for Trend Micro and is guest blogging for the Fearless Web. The opinions expressed here are his own.
To get more tips and advice regarding Internet security, just “Like” Trend Micro Fearless Web Internet Security on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/fearlessweb.
This entry was posted on Monday, 4. June 2012 and is filed under "Hackers and Phishing, Miscellaneous, Smart Protection Network". You can follow any responses to this entry with RSS 2.0. You can leave a response here, or send a trackback from your own site.
5 Comments to "A Response to the Ratings of 2012 Security Software by Consumer Reports"
ck:Tuesday, 5. June 2012 at 7:31 pm |
|
|
With respect to testing. Why hasn’t Trend been tested by Virus Bulletin since 2008 after failing for out of 5 VB100 tests? In AV-Comparative’s March test, Trend scored 18th out of 20 vendors. 2nd to last in missed samples and 17 out of 18 in terms of false positives. Fast is unimportant if you miss things. Virus Bulletin and AV-Comparatives are both extremely reputable. |
|
Bruce Kelley:Wednesday, 6. June 2012 at 4:27 am |
|
|
You do a good job but you dont keep me updated, my last update was 3/7/2012,I try to do the update but you say unable to at this time and to try again later (3 months of trying should be enough?) Thanks and hope you can bring me up to date. |
|
Fearless Web Team:Wednesday, 6. June 2012 at 3:20 pm |
|
|
Hello, Ck, Thank you for your comment and giving us the opportunity to talk about Virus Bulletin and AV-Comparatives. Our sole focus is on providing the right protection for our customers – and many of these tests use dated methodologies that don’t represent the way in which people use the Internet today. The AV-Comparatives test referenced is their dinosaur test similar to VB100 — which tests detection of viruses on infected computers that are not connected to the Internet. We do well in their whole-product dynamic test, which we use to test our effectiveness in the real-world threat scenarios that our customers face online every day. Regarding VB100, our position regarding their testing methodology was very clear when we withdrew participation, summed up by this Register post: http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2008/06/09/trend_vb_test_criticism/ . We really have nothing more to add, as in four years nothing has changed. Fast is very important for proactive protection versus reactive detection. Trend Micro Smart Protection Network focuses on using global threat intelligence to proactively block threats before they reach our customers’ networks and computers. |
|
Fearless Web Team:Thursday, 7. June 2012 at 8:36 pm |
|
|
Hi, Bruce, Sorry you’re having difficulty keeping your Trend Micro Security updated properly…Our customer support team had recommended that you try the solution here: |
|

JR:
Tuesday, 5. June 2012 at 6:42 pmYou are right on. I tried top rated Bitdefender with disasterous results. I am back with Trend Micro. Keep up the good work.
You are appreciated.